Implicit inheritance should handle annotations, too

[stephan]

When a role class contains annotations, these should be copied to any tsub-role, too.

[stephan]

Some tests are in A.1.17-otjld-copyinheritance-for-annotation-1 through A.1.17-otjld-copyinheritance-for-annotation-5.

The first test checks whether the compiler correctly sees a copy-inherited method as deprecated (essentially an issue of the RoleSplitter, though).

Subsequent tests retrieve the annotation at runtime. Kinds of annotations tested: marker, simple value, array values, multiple named members, nested annotation.

Implementation in r21512 passes all these tests. Note, that copying annotations wasn't the issue, they were already copied, but adjustment of names in copied annotations (pool indices) was missing.

Pending: annotations for fields (no bytecode copy here, so we need to re-construct annotations by some other means).

[stephan]

Shouldn't forget to finish this (re fields, see above).

[stephan]

Tests re fields are in A.1.17-otjld-copyinheritance-for-annotation-6 through A.1.17-otjld-copyinheritance-for-annotation-9

Implementation in r21990:

• for roles ignore if !options.storeAnnotations, need to read annotations for copying (BinaryTypeBinding)
• reconstruct annotation decl from binding (AstConverter)

[stephan]

One more addition is in r22352, now test TeamInheritanceIntergrationTest indeed passes.